We present DNS email security profiling for 272 K-12 LEAs in Colorado, of which 206 have active domains (75.7% coverage). Domains were scored on the Lokentra 100-point Email Security Index (ESI) rubric (SPF 30 pts + DKIM 30 pts + DMARC 40 pts). Colorado K-12 districts achieve an average ESI score of 48.3/100, with 24.8% earning Grade A or B (strong posture) and 29.1% receiving Grade F (minimal authentication). Only 51.9% have any DMARC record, and just 25.2% have DMARC at an enforcement level (quarantine or reject) — leaving 48.1% of districts fully vulnerable to email domain spoofing. This report provides entity-level data for all 206 scored domains including provider classification, authentication status, and ESI score, sourced from NCES CCD 2024-2025 and live DNS resolution conducted April 22, 2026.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total K-12 LEAs in state | 272 |
| Regular school districts | 178 |
| Charter LEAs | 2 |
| Other LEA types (state-operated, regional, etc.) | 92 |
| LEAs with active internet domain | 206 (75.7%) |
| Domains DNS-profiled | 206 |
| Data freshness (NCES CCD) | 2024-2025 school year |
| DNS scan date | April 22, 2026 |
To estimate human exposure, NCES national averages are applied to CCD 2024-2025 operational school counts: 381 students per school, 51 staff per school, and 2 parents or guardians per student. Colorado K-12 districts collectively operate approximately 1,900 schools.
| Population | Total in Dataset | At Risk (No DMARC, 48.1%) | Critically Exposed (Grade F, 29.1%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Students | 723,900 | 348,195 | 210,654 |
| Parents and guardians | 1,447,800 | 696,391 | 421,309 |
| Staff and educators | 96,900 | 46,608 | 28,197 |
| Total people | 2,268,600 | 1,091,196 | 660,162 |
Estimates based on NCES national averages. Individual district enrollment data can be linked via NCES LEAID for precise counts.
| Protocol | Colorado | National K-12 (ESI) | vs. National |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPF (any configuration) | 73.8% | 79.7% | -5.9pp |
| DKIM (key published) | 55.8% | 59.6% | -3.8pp |
| DMARC (any policy) | 51.9% | 55.5% | -3.6pp |
| DMARC at enforcement (quarantine/reject) | 25.2% | ~21.0% | +4.2pp |
| DMARC at reject (full enforcement) | 8.3% | ~12.2% | -3.9pp |
| No MX records (not receiving email) | 10.7% | ~10.0% | +0.7pp |
| Grade | Score | Districts | Share | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 90–100 | 23 | 11.2% | Full enforcement |
| B | 70–89 | 28 | 13.6% | Strong posture |
| C | 50–69 | 62 | 30.1% | Partial protection |
| D | 30–49 | 33 | 16.0% | Weak configuration |
| F | 0–29 | 60 | 29.1% | Minimal/no authentication |
| Average score | 48.3 / 100 | |||
| Provider | Districts | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Google Workspace | 137 | 66.5% |
| Microsoft 365 | 20 | 9.7% |
| Barracuda | 6 | 2.9% |
| Proofpoint | 5 | 2.4% |
| Mimecast | 3 | 1.5% |
| GoDaddy | 3 | 1.5% |
| District | Domain | County | Provider | SPF | DKIM | DMARC Policy | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cherrycreekschools.org |
Arapahoe County | Barracuda | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 100 | A | |
svvsd.org |
Boulder County | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 100 | A | |
cmsd12.org |
El Paso County | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 100 | A | |
adams14.org |
Adams County | Barracuda | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 100 | A | |
weldre5j.k12.co.us |
Weld County | — | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 100 | A | |
gilpin.k12.co.us |
Gilpin County | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 100 | A | |
egsd.org |
Grand County | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 100 | A | |
meeker.k12.co.us |
Rio Blanco County | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 100 | A | |
wgsd.us |
Grand County | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 100 | A | |
adams12.org |
Adams County | Proofpoint | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 95 | A | |
district70.org |
Pueblo County | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 95 | A | |
alamosaschools.org |
Alamosa County | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 95 | A | |
creedek12.net |
Mineral County | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 95 | A | |
cck12.net |
Crowley County | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 95 | A | |
mssd14.org |
El Paso County | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 95 | A |
| District | Domain | County | Provider | SPF | DKIM | DMARC Policy | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
adamsboces.org |
Adams County | — | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
idaliaco.us |
Yuma County | Google Workspace | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
sites.google.com |
Jackson County | — | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
neboces.com |
Phillips County | Google Workspace | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
englewoodschools.net |
Arapahoe County | — | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
rioblancoboces.org |
Rio Blanco County | — | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
elizabethschooldistrict.org |
Elbert County | — | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
aguilarschools.com |
Las Animas County | Google Workspace | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
mypagosaschools.com |
Archuleta County | GoDaddy | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
bransonschooldistrict.com |
Las Animas County | — | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
bethuneschool.com |
Kit Carson County | Google Workspace | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
cheraw.k12.co.us |
Otero County | Google Workspace | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
doloresschools.org |
Montezuma County | — | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
dbschools.org |
Mesa County | GoDaddy | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
genoahugo.org |
Lincoln County | Google Workspace | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F |
| County | Districts | Website Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| El Paso County | 32 | 100.0% |
| Weld County | 18 | 100.0% |
| Adams County | 13 | 100.0% |
| Arapahoe County | 12 | 100.0% |
| Pueblo County | 8 | 100.0% |
| Denver County | 7 | 100.0% |
| Otero County | 7 | 100.0% |
| Garfield County | 7 | 100.0% |
| Larimer County | 6 | 100.0% |
| La Plata County | 6 | 100.0% |
These findings identify specific, actionable gaps in Colorado's K-12 email security posture. The 48.1% DMARC gap represents districts that can be impersonated by any sender, enabling phishing campaigns targeting parents, students, and educators with no authentication failure. Key observations:
p=none). Upgrading to p=quarantine would move them to B without infrastructure changes.The full Colorado K-12 dataset — 272 entities with NCES CCD enrichment (phone, address, grade span, school count, LEAID) and DNS authentication profiles — is available as part of the Lokentra ESI State Pack.
| Tier | Scope | Suggested Use |
|---|---|---|
| State Pack: Colorado | All 272 K-12 LEAs, full DNS profile + CCD enrichment | Regional studies, state policy, outreach |
| K-12 National | All 50 states, 20,021+ K-12 LEAs | National K-12 cybersecurity research |
| Full Registry | 801,359+ entities across all sectors | Comprehensive multi-sector research |
| API + Updates | Quarterly re-scan, REST API | Longitudinal studies, live dashboards |
Contact: research@monitorworkspace.com — Free demo at monitorworkspace.com/scorecard
Citation: Lokentra Research Team (2026). Colorado K-12 Email Security Intelligence: DNS Authentication Profiling of 272 School District LEAs. Lokentra U.S. Email Security Index (ESI) — State Intelligence Series. https://lokentra-site.web.app/research/states/co-k12-paper.html
Data sources: NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-2025; DNS records resolved via Google Public DNS (8.8.8.8) and Cloudflare (1.1.1.1). All entity data derived from publicly accessible government registries.
National baseline figures from Lokentra U.S. Education Sector Email Security Intelligence Dataset (March 2026). See education-dataset-paper.html for full methodology.