We present DNS email security profiling for 70 K-12 LEAs in District of Columbia, of which 70 have active domains (100.0% coverage). Domains were scored on the Lokentra 100-point Email Security Index (ESI) rubric (SPF 30 pts + DKIM 30 pts + DMARC 40 pts). District of Columbia K-12 districts achieve an average ESI score of 54.0/100, with 30.0% earning Grade A or B (strong posture) and 22.9% receiving Grade F (minimal authentication). Only 65.7% have any DMARC record, and just 27.1% have DMARC at an enforcement level (quarantine or reject) — leaving 34.3% of districts fully vulnerable to email domain spoofing. This report provides entity-level data for all 70 scored domains including provider classification, authentication status, and ESI score, sourced from NCES CCD 2024-2025 and live DNS resolution conducted April 22, 2026.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total K-12 LEAs in state | 70 |
| Regular school districts | 1 |
| Charter LEAs | 69 |
| Other LEA types (state-operated, regional, etc.) | 0 |
| LEAs with active internet domain | 70 (100.0%) |
| Domains DNS-profiled | 70 |
| Data freshness (NCES CCD) | 2024-2025 school year |
| DNS scan date | April 22, 2026 |
To estimate human exposure, NCES national averages are applied to CCD 2024-2025 operational school counts: 381 students per school, 51 staff per school, and 2 parents or guardians per student. District of Columbia K-12 districts collectively operate approximately 242 schools.
| Population | Total in Dataset | At Risk (No DMARC, 34.3%) | Critically Exposed (Grade F, 22.9%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Students | 92,202 | 31,625 | 21,114 |
| Parents and guardians | 184,404 | 63,250 | 42,228 |
| Staff and educators | 12,342 | 4,233 | 2,826 |
| Total people | 288,948 | 99,109 | 66,169 |
Estimates based on NCES national averages. Individual district enrollment data can be linked via NCES LEAID for precise counts.
| Protocol | District of Columbia | National K-12 (ESI) | vs. National |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPF (any configuration) | 82.9% | 79.7% | +3.2pp |
| DKIM (key published) | 62.9% | 59.6% | +3.3pp |
| DMARC (any policy) | 65.7% | 55.5% | +10.2pp |
| DMARC at enforcement (quarantine/reject) | 27.1% | ~21.0% | +6.1pp |
| DMARC at reject (full enforcement) | 11.4% | ~12.2% | -0.8pp |
| No MX records (not receiving email) | 2.9% | ~10.0% | -7.1pp |
| Grade | Score | Districts | Share | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 90–100 | 9 | 12.9% | Full enforcement |
| B | 70–89 | 12 | 17.1% | Strong posture |
| C | 50–69 | 24 | 34.3% | Partial protection |
| D | 30–49 | 9 | 12.9% | Weak configuration |
| F | 0–29 | 16 | 22.9% | Minimal/no authentication |
| Average score | 54.0 / 100 | |||
| Provider | Districts | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Google Workspace | 46 | 65.7% |
| Microsoft 365 | 14 | 20.0% |
| Barracuda | 1 | 1.4% |
| Sophos | 1 | 1.4% |
| GoDaddy | 1 | 1.4% |
| District | Domain | County | Provider | SPF | DKIM | DMARC Policy | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
lambpcs.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 100 | A | |
pspdc.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 95 | A | |
kippdc.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 95 | A | |
ccpcs.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 95 | A | |
tworiverspcs.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 95 | A | |
bridgespcs.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 95 | A | |
mundoverdepcs.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 95 | A | |
friendshipschools.org |
District of Columbia | Barracuda | ✓ | ✓ | reject | 93 | A | |
stcoletta.org |
District of Columbia | Microsoft 365 | ✓ | ✓ | quarantine | 90 | A | |
ewstokes.org |
District of Columbia | — | ✓ | ✓ | quarantine | 88 | B | |
dcprep.org |
District of Columbia | Microsoft 365 | ✓ | ✓ | quarantine | 88 | B | |
seeforever.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | quarantine | 85 | B | |
nextsteppcs.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | quarantine | 85 | B | |
richardwrightpcs.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✓ | quarantine | 85 | B | |
dcscholars.org |
District of Columbia | — | ✓ | ✓ | quarantine | 85 | B |
| District | Domain | County | Provider | SPF | DKIM | DMARC Policy | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mpcs-dc.org |
District of Columbia | — | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
dcps.dc.gov |
District of Columbia | — | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
ideapcs.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
monumentacademy.org |
District of Columbia | — | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
laycca.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
harmonydc.org |
District of Columbia | Sophos | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
washingtonleadershipacademy.org |
District of Columbia | GoDaddy | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
idreampcs.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
thesocialjusticeschool.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✗ | ✗ | — | 0 | F | |
thetruthschool.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✗ | ✗ | none | 10 | F | |
mmbethune.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✗ | — | 25 | F | |
shiningstarspcs.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✗ | — | 25 | F | |
centercitypcs.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✗ | — | 25 | F | |
creativemindspcs.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✗ | — | 25 | F | |
washingtonglobal.org |
District of Columbia | Google Workspace | ✓ | ✗ | — | 25 | F |
| County | Districts | Website Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | 70 | 100.0% |
These findings identify specific, actionable gaps in District of Columbia's K-12 email security posture. The 34.3% DMARC gap represents districts that can be impersonated by any sender, enabling phishing campaigns targeting parents, students, and educators with no authentication failure. Key observations:
p=none). Upgrading to p=quarantine would move them to B without infrastructure changes.The full District of Columbia K-12 dataset — 70 entities with NCES CCD enrichment (phone, address, grade span, school count, LEAID) and DNS authentication profiles — is available as part of the Lokentra ESI State Pack.
| Tier | Scope | Suggested Use |
|---|---|---|
| State Pack: District of Columbia | All 70 K-12 LEAs, full DNS profile + CCD enrichment | Regional studies, state policy, outreach |
| K-12 National | All 50 states, 20,021+ K-12 LEAs | National K-12 cybersecurity research |
| Full Registry | 801,359+ entities across all sectors | Comprehensive multi-sector research |
| API + Updates | Quarterly re-scan, REST API | Longitudinal studies, live dashboards |
Contact: research@monitorworkspace.com — Free demo at monitorworkspace.com/scorecard
Citation: Lokentra Research Team (2026). District of Columbia K-12 Email Security Intelligence: DNS Authentication Profiling of 70 School District LEAs. Lokentra U.S. Email Security Index (ESI) — State Intelligence Series. https://lokentra-site.web.app/research/states/dc-k12-paper.html
Data sources: NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-2025; DNS records resolved via Google Public DNS (8.8.8.8) and Cloudflare (1.1.1.1). All entity data derived from publicly accessible government registries.
National baseline figures from Lokentra U.S. Education Sector Email Security Intelligence Dataset (March 2026). See education-dataset-paper.html for full methodology.